Appreciate Differences and Similarities in Texts Essay

Appreciate Differences and Similarities in Texts - Essay ExampleThese articles directly targets rudimentary readers. direct of education of readers and their class These types of readers mostly belong from upper senior, high school level where their main confinement is to do straightforward analysis. Get the relationships between the documents, do a critical analysis and make popular conclusions from this. Students in this level of education get mainly interested in entertaining articles that they potentiometer advantageously put into practice their reading and understanding analytical skills. The dickens articles in question are admirable examples that high school level students may be materially interested in as they go along with their basic reading abilities that vary from independent, instructional and frustration. Writing techniques used by the writers In the two given articles, just like other written materials, they contain a wide variety of paternity techniques that h elp to appeal t the readers and help convey the intended message with a clear understanding. on that point is many writing technique s that writers involve in their works of writing. These writing techniques need to sport a deliberate impact to the readers. ... The first article is ironical. It is not logical for humans to complain on the violation of animals rights when involved i8n testing of new medicines, while the medicine that is cosmos tested is for ensuring human survival. In the same article, it is rather ironical that humans complain on animals torture in medical checkup tests, while humans do them in order to ensure that the animals too also can survive as animals medicine do exist too. .yet it is not only humans who benefit from medical science. Researching on animals has also led to many advances in veterinary medicine practices. Dogs can now be protected against distemper.cats can now be immunized against enteritis and cat flu. The writer portrays verbal mockery i n this article as the writer contradicts the human party stand. Different impressions created by the two texts The writers in the two articles give an array of mixed fillings. The writer in the first article gives the reader no clear perspective on his article. In addition to giving mixed emotions, they are also far-flung all over the article. In the first paragraph, he talks about humans and death and makes no substantial deal out of it. He makes it look like a normal thing and gives it or so improvement that life expectancy has improved from the past times. However at a point in the article, he talks tells how humans make use of animals for their own benefits. He questions it to be either a matter of animals right or human ill. At this point, the writer creates an impression that humans are being unfair to animals. The writer portrays this, as an act of selfishness by humans. Before this the writer says,